So I actually don’t think that is what I am saying or not what I mean. I actually do believe in some degree of contextual relativism as more important as a stance than universalism. By shared ethical intuition I do not assume we will all agree on a set of rule for all contexts. I assume that for particular situations and contexts, the relevant stakeholders (as broadly defined as possible) have a participatory process by which they understand each other’s ethics enough to develop a similar ethical intuition about that situation/context. This may differ in different contexts for many reasons including a different set of stakeholders involved in a decision. I can give examples later…gotta go now, though.