“a system of anonymous peer review tends to work against scholarship that runs against the grain of currently accepted ideas” – great post on open peer review vs. anonymous peer reciew
Origins of Courteous Review
April 15, 2014 | 3 Comments
Reflecting Allowed
Maha Bali’s blog about education
April 15, 2014 at 10:22 am
“Reviews of inordinate savagery say more about the reviewer than the book being reviewed.”
– Martin Amis, The Moronic Inferno (slightly paraphrased, no doubt, by me because I can’t remember the exact words!)
April 15, 2014 at 11:06 am
good quote, David!
April 15, 2014 at 9:08 pm
Thanks Maha, speaks to the ability for change to have a voice that isn’t erased by those already positioned to speak. I’m not sure that courtesy is entirely required when standing for a deeply held value. But without a signature it certainly isn’t a dialog. We do sometimes have to allow voices that wish not to be named–how can we do that?