Hi You write: I guess what Dave was saying was that the idea of cheating assumes someone else has the answer, and that there is actually one answer that is possible to reach alone. Whereas much learning occurs “in-between” rather than within each of us (sounds like social constructivism but i am sure rhizomatic learning goes beyond that).
Would the difference be: Social constructivism is much more constructed and formal, while rhizomatic learning is more fuzzy and unpredictable?