Ha, you caught me here. I do problematize the term “inclusive” and I do use Equity more often, find it a better term for what I mean… I think I will change that. I was thinking of how I might use this image in upcoming keynotes, and I think I will invite audiences to decide what to put in the slices. I think slices can be things like what Hanesworth mentions in their article. I had not reading it, but it is gratifying that they included 3 of the things I included. But the slices could be more granular, too, right? Like if we look at it from an accessibility angle, you could say “captions”, “asynchronous learning” and mention for whom such approaches work and for whom they don’t. I have been reading and discussing the notion of assemblages and though I am not yet ready to talk about it publicly 🙃 I like the idea of the dynamism there… and I guess getting slices of cheese together is a kind of assemblage and when you have a certain mix of learners in a particular course, you need to assemble different strategies to meet their needs/goals. When we have to imagine learners a priori, as in a MOOC, then we develop personas that represent learners we expect to work with. If we discover a different set of learners show up – what kind of flexibility is designed already to make the space hospitable or at least accommodating (recognizing not every course can be co-created with actual learners). Thanks for making me think…