Estimated reading time: 4 minutes, 1 second
It’s difficult to focus at a museum when I have my child with me, because I’m drawn to what interests her the most, and I’m also learning myself. So yesterday, after following one of the family trails in the British Museum with her, I decided to enter one of the ground floor exhibits, which was roughly about living and dying and treating illness.
I found quite a few things in the exhibit confusing. It’s possible if I was able to dig deeper or get a headset I’d understand all this better, but I also do think museums should have a level of support for average passers-by to understand a theme without having to work too hard…
First of all, I had a moment of wondering why this was called the British museum at all, since most of what’s in it is not about Britain at all 🙂 I understand the colonial history, so I guess the monuments upstairs from ancient Egypt, etc, are conquests from the British empire. But I didn’t really understand the exhibit about living and dying because it had some specific pieces from different countries in the world displaying some current-day practices in various parts of the world.
Ok so it kinda gets more confusing. I’m curious how they select which areas of the world to represent, how they choose which artifacts to represent and what stories to tell? For example, they have artifacts from a part of Egypt called Siwa (known as a place people sometimes go for healing) but they’re displaying things like the kinds of sandals they wear… Which, I don’t understand? The text around this area didn’t really clarify to me (though maybe it was somewhere else I couldn’t see).
There different display cases around how different cultures dealt with illness and death, down to particular countries like Somalia and particular places like Siwa in Egypt …. And then there was a small display case for Western Europe which was the weirdest thing.
To begin with, having just one display case for ALL of Western Europe is extremely weird. I mean, if you’re gonna go country by country elsewhere and down to particular small locations like Siwa, isn’t lumping all of (Western) Europe an odd thing to do? This case talked about how people in Europe prayed to saints and it had a lot of Christian figurines that.. Uhh… Felt like it did not represent either diversity within Christianity (Protestant vs Catholic vs Orthodox at the very least) or any geographic diversity – and like, no mention of atheism or Judaism either historically or in modern day. It made no sense to me at all.
And it also made me realize that there was an assumption across all the display cases that hid all the similarities in use of modern day (Western) medicine in most countries of the world. I mean, even in Western Europe, the people who are religious and pray to the saints… Surely most of them still go to hospitals and doctors and stuff. Unless they’re into alternative treatments, which I didn’t see any mention of. Similarly, in many parts of the world that I know of (of course I don’t know everything), people who live in or near cities use modern day medicine (for better or worse). Can you imagine representing America and how medicine is dealt with by only showcasing how native American traditional healing is done? It is worth a display case, to learn about ancient healing practices, especially if they’re practiced today still, but would you expect people to generalize this about modern-day America? No, right? But you realize that in parts of the world considered more exotic to Europeans… like Africa and Asia, an observer may make the assumption? And if tourists themselves are from countries in Africa and Asia, might they not want to dig a bit deeper into European practices?
I get that the focus of the exhibit, or at least the room I saw, wasn’t modern-day medicine, perhaps it was the unscientific and spiritual practices instead. I get that giving Europe a smaller space (dunno where Eastern Europe was, btw) is a good thing in terms of making room for more diverse cultures to be shown. But I’m baffled by this display still and by the kinds of stereotypes of modernity and barbarism it perpetuated.
Beside some large African colorful beautiful masks used in rituals to fend from ghosts (or some such), you see these dainty civilized figurines (like literally the size of my fingers) of saints and nuns and people praying. It was… Weird.
If I had more time I’d go again and I’m thinking that museums need “second looks” after we’ve had time to process what we see… And perhaps a guide next time when my kid is old enough to stay put and not get distracted.