Estimated reading time: 1 minute, 54 seconds
So for some reason i found myself wondering if the rules of politeness change in things like wikis and even more so (but differently) on fedwiki
Let me sort of explain. Recently i mentioned to some ppl how i disliked a lack of “track changes ” in google docs (fortunately they have the feature now as “suggested edits” but it only works on a computer not Android /iOS) – annoying because i do a lot of collab writing on it, often w multiple ppl so the only polite way to edit was to comment – which can get annoying really fast.
Wikis in general don’t do that. But for some reason i feel like fedwiki should allow it in some form.
Forking someone else’s page and making it your own – it reminds me a lot about first week of #rhizo14 and cheating as learning? Not in an unethical way but in the sense of messing up attribution. Alan is right that ppl are mostly just adding comments at the bottom politely. But later if ppl start working on sthg together it could get interesting
A. You don’t ask permission to fork but u don’t generally ask permission to quote someone else’s book article or blogpost – wholesale is another issue.
B. You don’t get to know who forked you unless you keep going back to your pages to see updates in the favicons (love those little squares)
C. You don’t get a polite way to comment in-text
D. You don’t get a polite way to highlight your edits so original author or others can choose to accept or reject them ONE BY ONE. YOu have to fork wholesale
So i recently got annoyed as Alan and I seemed to be editing the same doc and i forked and edited thej saw he did more edits before i saved. So now there was a version i had with one Alan edit and one Maha edit and another version w 2 Alan edits and no Maha. In the end i chose to copy/paste my own simple text into the version of two Alan edits. But if it was more work it would SUCK! Am i right? Forking annoying
P.S. Fork 🍴 icon from phone